This message is to get a vote if you think dna is warranted in this case.

facts mother father were getting a divorce. night before divorce next day they get back together.

child is born within a 9 month period.

marriage is horrible

husband finds out she has filed for divorce again when child is 18 mo old

husband finds out she has squirreled all the bill money and money he got from father totalling over thirty five thousand dollars

husband drinks excessively

husband walks off after confronting her with the divorce papers

wife refuses to let husband see child

husband does not pay child support

husband goes to x mother in laws to get his stuff and mother in law ask him how does he know that child is his

mother in law had pushed the couple into marring because she had knowledge of husbands parents getting large sum of money.

now husbands mother is old and lives well unknown to most it is a set up that will only last her life time.

husband and grown child make contact child does not look like anyone on mother or fathers side of the family.

now grown child always tells about financial woes when on the phone to father

when grown child told mother that he had made contact with father she threw a fit and forbid him to have any contact even though he is above legal age.

is it fair to grown child if husband is not the father to find out the truth once and for all or just leave things as they are

child confirmed that mother has much interest in men confirming what husband had said that was one of the problems in the marriage

i want this vote to be as completely unbiased as can possible be with this small amount of facts. personally i want the dna but i also want the child to be the husbands.